This article argues that writing about fishing and marine biology allowed Ernest Hemingway and John Steinbeck, respectively, to express a resistance to narrative resolution. Hemingway’s In Our Time ([1925] 1980) addresses the meaning and aftermath of World War I, while Steinbeck’s Cannery Row (1945) responds to World War II by not talking about it at all. Both books submerge war to discuss its effects on the psyche and landscape and seek solace by depicting rituals that have meaning but do not insist on finality. In this, fishing and specimen collecting provide non-teleological models for cognition and writing that resist the tyranny of resolution. Steinbeck and Hemingway render that celebration of open-endedness and process in the short story cycle because it allows them to meditate on the ongoing ritual of thinking and, by extension, writing.
Source
By Jennifer J. Smith (2013): “Writing ritual, resisting resolution: The short story cycles of Hemingway and Steinbeck” in Short Fiction in Theory & Practice, Volume 3, Issue 2, Oct 2013, p. 175 – 191
Link: https://doi.org/10.1386/fict.3.2.175_1
Notes
There doesn’t seem to be any free options available for reading this article at the Intellect Discover site so you will either have to make a purchase or ask your academic library if they have access.